Jef Rouner doesn’t want you to vote third party.
He suggests that it’s the equivalent of thoughts and prayers, but he is projecting. He is the sanctimonious scold. Voting for either major party is the very epitome of thoughts and prayers. You have no control over what these people do once elected. You’re voting for a collection of promises and a bunch of rhetoric. No political promises are ever kept, and even laws that get passed do not achieve what the politicians claim.
There is no “work” involved in going into a voting booth and checking a box. He’s not writing laws, and I doubt he has the slightest inkling of what’s contained in a single federal law or regulation, yet he’s saying he is somehow responsible for the outcomes because he checked a box in a voting booth. He is complicit in the sense that he paid mindless obedience to the system.
Mr. Rouner wants to take credit for the ACA, but does he accept responsibility for the premiums which have increased for average citizens because healthy young people aren’t singing up to subsidize the older and sicker? Does he accept responsibility for all the money wasted on failed state level exchanges?
Or how about his passing mention of Obama’s drone program? Doesn’t the mass murder of thousands kind of nullify any claim on a moral high ground? The invasion of Libya, anyone? The militarization of the police? Arms sales to Middle Eastern regimes? The ongoing and impenetrable mess in Syria?
Since he seems so keen on conflating the individual with the State, how about those achievements, Mr. Rouner?
He invokes the 12th Amendment as the source of the two party duopoly, but since this only codified the process by which the President and Vice President would be elected, this seems little more than an appeal to tradition.
I don’t have any objections to anyone voting third party. If you find their ideas compelling, then go for it. The idea at the center of the American idea was individual liberty, and that should include freedom of political thought.
It’s true that the system doesn’t favor third party candidates at the federal level. It is possible to pull off being an open socialist or libertarian at the local level and win, and there are examples of both.
I would argue that the real work of the political process is the battle for ideas, and the current system crowds out any vigorous debate of ideas. For Mr. Rouner to suggest that “nothing Stein or Johnson says matters” completely diminishes and downplays the power of ideas. Third party candidacies are good for the country in the sense that they are vehicles for trenchant criticism of the system and the advancement of unconventional and heretical ideas. Between the two third party choices, there’s a little bit of both. I also find Jill Stein’s agenda utterly abhorrent, but I appreciate some of the criticisms she’s leveled at Hillary. And despite the fact that Gary Johnson is not the most inspiring champion of libertarian philosophy, it’s refreshing that at least one candidate is promoting actual liberty.
Slavery notwithstanding, the American system of government was meant to enshrine property rights and the liberty of the individual. The idea behind federalism was to decentralize power and disperse it throughout the states. I also contend that this is why the 2nd Amendment makes reference to militias. It was meant to be a bulwark against the greatest threat to liberty: a standing army.
But we’re very far away from that idea, and I vigorously dispute that casting a vote for Trump or Hillary represents anything virtuous. There is no “change from within” to be made. Even if you dedicated yourself to a single issue, it has the potential to consume your entire life if you allow it to. The federal government is an overgrown behemoth populated mostly by self-interested and self-aggrandizing hacks who are more interested in preserving their fiefdoms than doing anything that serves the “Public Good”.
By portraying participation in government as the only path to affecting change, he’s contributing to an ever diminishing sphere of individual liberty, destroying the possibility for voluntary, organic interactions and solutions between citizens and promoting a culture of servitude. He correctly claims that leadership and accountability are virtues, but by promoting a vote for the system, he’s promoting the least accountable people on the planet. The American spirit was born of skepticism of government power, not obedience.
The only sanctimonious cunt who’s trying to browbeat his readers into voting for this corrupt two party duopoly is Jef Rouner.